Last updated: June 24 2009

IPPís:  Do Pension Income Splitting Rules Apply?

by John Mill LL.M.
 
Last year CRA announced that seniors could split Registered Pension Plan (RPP) income with their spouses. Splitting pension income provides the following benefits:
  • Income is taxed at lower rate;
  • access to an additional pension credit;
  • reduces OAS clawback.

For a senior couple on a fixed pension income with one spouse receiving a $100,000 annual pension and the other spouse receiving no income; the tax savings arising simply from splitting the pension income could be an additional $14,000 a year, tax free.

For those with lower pensions, the savings are equally impressive.  For example, a pensioner living in Ontario earning $40,000 in pension income annually could save just over $2,300 per year in tax by taking advantage of pension splitting available for spouses and common law partners.1
 
Small business owners and professionals should note a difference between RPPs and RRSPs. RRSPs allow income splitting through the transferring of RRSP contributions to the spouse, this rule however does not allow RRSP income to be split. While RPP periodic pension recipients can start splitting pension income at any age, RRSP pension income recipients must wait until age 65. Unfair, particularly in view of the significant tax savings, which can build the couple's capital pool.

A solution for the incorporated business owner is an Individual Pension Plan (ìIPPî). An IPP is a provincially registered pension plan often described as a super size RRSP available to corporate owner managers and professionals.

But does an IPP qualify for pension income splitting? A quick survey of the internet indicates many different points of view with respect to the ability to split pension payments received from an IPP. Some say you cannot split IPP income, some say you can split IPP income if you annuitize the IPP, and others simply say you can split IPP income without any explanation.

The correct position is this:

- payments made directly from an IPP (a withdrawal) cannot be split;

- if you annuitize an IPP, the annuity payments can be split;

- if you have attained the age of 65, and transfer the IPP to a registered retirement income fund (ìRRIFî), the RRIF payments can be split.

For the technically minded it appears confusion arises from ITA s. 118 which sets out the differing treatment depending on age and s. 118 (e) which tells what pension payments are not eligible to be split:

(e) a payment received out of or under a salary deferral arrangement, a retirement compensation arrangement, an employee benefit plan, an employee trust or a prescribed provincial pension plan;

The confusion may arise because retirement compensation payments (ìRCAsî) are excluded and IPPs are registered provincial pension plans. However, IPPs are not RCA's or prescribed. ITA Reg. 7800 tells us what a ìprescribed provincial planî is:

7800.(1) For the purposes of clause 56(1)(a)(i)(C), subsection 56(2), paragraph 60(v), subsection 74.1(1) and paragraph 118(8)(e) of the Act, the Saskatchewan Pension Plan is a prescribed provincial pension plan.

Saskatchewan has the only prescribed provincial pension plan, and that pension plan has nothing to do with IPPs. The ITA confirms that an IPP pension payment qualifies in the two circumstances set out above:

118(7)(a)

(i) a payment in respect of a life annuity out of or under a superannuation or pension plan,
 
Ö

(iii) a payment out of or under a registered retirement income fund or under an ìamended fundî as referred to in subsection 146.3(11),

1 Calculation courtesy of the Tax Efficient Retirement Income Calculator available through The Knowledge Bureau
 
 
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES: Readers are invited to learn more about retirement income planning, income splitting and simulations for planning scenarios with The Knowledge Bureau's RIS program and projection software; summer school enrolments now possible.
 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR John Mill LL.M. has practiced corporate law for more than 20 years. Ten years ago he decided to take his tax expertise to a new level; he completed a Master's degree in International Taxation and then wrote the text for a Knowledge Bureau certificate course entitled Cross Border Taxation. In the course of his taxation studies he noticed consistent references to life insurance which is a tax free product. Consequently he obtained an life insurance licence. He is currently working on his second book regarding the most effective use of retained earnings.